Current:Home > FinanceA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -SummitInvest
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-13 02:37:35
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- Patriots apparently turning to Bailey Zappe at quarterback in Week 13
- Latest hospital cyberattack shows how health care systems' vulnerability can put patients at risk
- Bills linebacker Von Miller facing arrest for assaulting a pregnant person, Dallas police say
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- Kathy Hilton Shares Shocking Update on Status of Feud With RHOBH Costar Lisa Rinna
- Piers Morgan Says Kate Middleton, King Charles Named for Alleged Skin Color Comments to Harry, Meghan
- 'Here we go!': Why Cowboys' Dak Prescott uses unique snap cadence
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- Influential Detroit pastor the Rev. Charles Gilchrist Adams dies at age 86
Ranking
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- Cristiano Ronaldo faces $1B class-action lawsuit for promoting for Binance NFTs
- Why do millennials know so much about personal finance? (Hint: Ask their parents.)
- K-pop group The Boyz talk 'Sixth Sense', album trilogy and love for The B
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
- Stock market today: Asian shares slip after Wall Street ends its best month of ’23 with big gains
- Kraft 'Not Mac and Cheese,' a dairy-free version of the beloved dish, coming to US stores
- Oklahoma executes man in double murders despite parole board recommendation for clemency
Recommendation
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
'Killers of the Flower Moon' selected 2023's best movie by New York Film Critics Circle
Wolverines now considered threatened species under Endangered Species Act
Mississippi Supreme Court delays decision on whether to set execution date for man on death row
Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
Still alive! Golden mole not seen for 80 years and presumed extinct is found again in South Africa
'Tears streaming down my face': New Chevy commercial hits home with Americans
See Blue Ivy and Beyoncé's Buzzing Moment at Renaissance Film London Premiere